43 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Alec Leamas is the protagonist of the novel, and almost every chapter follows his perspective. He is a British Intelligence agent responsible for running spies in enemy territory, East Berlin, and he has a successful record in both WWII and the Cold War. However, at the start of the novel, he is past his prime, bearing the scars from a life in the shadows. His physique remains impressive in middle age, with an “attractive face, muscular” (18), and a bearing that would get him “the best table” at a Berlin nightclub (19), if not a posh London club. He shows very little of his inner life to others, coming across as gruff, rude, and deeply cynical. Even before the he deliberately destroys his professional career, he is a heavy drinker, and Control surmises that Leamas has grown “tired of spying” (24), with a deep desire “never […] to cause suffering again” on account of all he has experienced in the field (26).
The suggestion that Leamas has lost his edge points to his defining quality, his pride. Having lost any faith that his work as a spy is serving some kind of higher purpose (if he ever had such faith in the first place), and harboring little affection for the reckless Riemeck, Leamas’s primary motivation in undertaking his final mission is to prove his ability, if only to himself. As is the case for many tragic heroes, pride proves to be Leamas’s undoing. Both Peters and Fiedler refer to Leamas as a proud man and therefore believe Leamas’s claim not to know about a German agent beyond his control, especially since Leamas believes that to be true.
When Leamas learns that his pride has made him a useful instrument for the Circus, it confirms his view that people are all at the mercy of systems beyond their control, and he calls his and Fiedler’s fate “a small price for a big return” (245), which Liz thinks is him attempting to rationalize his being deceived. Leamas’s relationship with Liz does not exactly soften him—he is rude and often cruel to her to the very end, and he can never quite accept her desire for genuine intimacy. He does have great affection for her, though, and sees her as an innocent person who should not have to suffer the consequences of his choices. When his actions ultimately get her killed, he instantly decides to make amends by joining in her fate.
Liz Gold begins as Leamas’s romantic interest. She provides a human connection that has been sorely lacking in his life. At the same time, she respects his aversion to intimacy, and puts up with his frequently rude treatment of her. She is described as physically awkward, and “her face, like her body, had large components which seemed to hesitate between plainness and beauty” (37). Her personality similarly hesitates between shyness and warmth. She is the one who invites Leamas to dine with her, she is adept at dealing with Miss Crail’s moods, and she is quick to detect and evade men with ulterior motives. At the same time, her relationship with Leamas is unequal from the start, with her knowing that he will soon leave and promising, “You must go when you want. I’ll never follow you, Alec” (41), even before their connection becomes romantic. She endures his poor treatment of her without complaint, and after his shocking arrest, trusts his plan rather than seek out answers.
Liz’s membership in the British Communist Party speaks to another kind of ambivalence within her character. Leamas treats the revelation as a joke, and later tells her that it’s merely a hobby for her: “Some people keep canaries, some people join the Party” (165). It soon becomes clear, however, that Liz is no mere hobbyist, as she possesses a deeply humanistic vision of peace and progress, which likely stems at least in part from her father’s death in the Holocaust. She claims to believe in “history,” but as Leamas will later point out to her, she recoils at the prospect of people suffering even though Communists have never “preached the sanctity of human life” (245).
Liz is acted upon more than she acts. She is the passive beneficiary of a mysterious entity that pays off her lease, and receives an invitation to East Germany that blatantly mischaracterizes her work and reputation. On the witness stand, she is described as a “blind child,” and she breaks down in tears under the withering questioning of Karden. She is an innocent person who suffers greatly, and through this experience she emerges as the moral center of the novel who exposes the insufficiency of Leamas’s cynicism. Her appeals to justice may not accomplish much, but she plainly points out what Leamas cannot admit, that Fiedler’s fate is unjust. By the end, she has moved from love interest to a figure whose tragedy is even more profound than that of the protagonist. Her fundamental honesty and willingness to see good in people makes her the perfect tool for the security services on either side of the Iron Curtain.
The antagonist of the novel, Hans-Dieter Mundt is a fearsome spymaster. He was a Nazi as a young man before rising through the ranks of the Stasi, one of the most feared intelligence agencies of the Cold War. For most of the book, the mere mention of Mundt’s name is enough to provoke fear and dread in the other characters. It’s said that his own agents “dread him” as much as the British do. His rapid ascent through the ranks suggests extraordinary abilities, and he has turned the cloak-and-dagger intrigue of Berlin into a mob war. For a readership that has learned to associate Germany with evil, Mundt is a Teutonic supervillain, but he is also the white whale to Leamas’s Captain Ahab, the prize that must be taken to justify a lifetime of hardships and sacrifice. Like Moby Dick, he disappears from the novel for long stretches, and when he does appear, his mere presence is enough to drive the action, without his having to do or say very much.
When Leamas finally meets him, he finds something almost admirable in the man’s “extraordinary self-confidence,” which spares him from needing to build psychological rapport with his interrogation subjects. Leamas sees him as “a man of fact and action” (176), which Leamas welcomes after having dealt with Fiedler’s extensive philosophical inquiries. Yet it soon becomes evident that Mundt is villainous not because he represents a totalitarian agency or even because he is responsible for many deaths, but because he is a petty, cruel man driven by antisemitism. It also becomes clear that he is an ideological mercenary, working for the capitalists to spare himself the consequences of his own reckless actions. His mighty reputation in East Germany is thanks to his secret work for the British: Only the Circus could provide him with the intelligence to represent himself as an all-knowing and all-seeing mastermind. Mundt is entirely the creature of his handlers; he rose through the ranks through false allegations and seedy cover-ups. His cruelty often seems purposeless, as when he releases Liz and Leamas from prison, only to have them gunned down at the Berlin Wall. As a man without loyalty or scruples, he has made himself indispensable to both sides of the Cold War, which explains in no small part why he is the only major character to survive.
Fiedler is introduced as a secondary antagonist, a deputy of Mundt with a similar capacity for violence, including against British agents. When he first meets Leamas, he immediately informs him that Peters’s plan to facilitate travel to Scandinavia was a ruse, and that Leamas will presumably have to stay indefinitely within the Eastern Bloc. Of all the Communist agents that Leamas encounters throughout the novel, Fiedler is the only one who espouses its ideology with sincerity. This combination of authority, deceit, and fanaticism gives him all the trappings of a classic Cold War villain, but over the course of the novel, Fiedler shifts from adversary to useful ally to tragic figure in his own right. Widely suspected of being a jealous subordinate, Fiedler turns out to have all the right reasons for opposing Mundt, although he sometimes arrives there on the basis of faulty information. He is a skilled intelligence officer who compares his work to that of a gardener, carefully nurturing an asset until they are ready to bear the fruit of information. Mundt responds with the callous dictum that “thistles must be cut down before they flower” (159). Mundt directly challenges Fiedler’s work, and more importantly, offends his sense of professional ethics.
Fiedler is also genuinely interested in the nuances of ideological differences between the West and Communist states, unlike Mundt and Leamas. As a Jew, Fiedler is surely old enough to have lived through the Holocaust, and so he joins Liz as a survivor of Nazi terror who looks to communism as a universal ideology that admits no fundamental differences among ethnicities and religions. Judging by the antisemitism espoused by Mundt, the tribunal, and the commissar, who insists that “we don’t need their kind here” (234), the idealistic Fiedler is out of step with the Party at large. Fiedler proves wrong in his estimation that Westerners cannot sacrifice the individual to the common good, or that a Communist state would only sacrifice the individual to advance the socialist revolution. His integrity makes him a suitable instrument for both sides of the Cold War, and ultimately gets him killed. Whether Fiedler is able to justify his own death as necessary for the greater good remains unknown at the novel’s end.
Unlock all 43 pages of this Study Guide
Plus, gain access to 9,150+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By John le Carré
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Historical Fiction
View Collection
Horror, Thrillers, & Suspense
View Collection
Mystery & Crime
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
TV Shows Based on Books
View Collection
War
View Collection